Founder Equity and Vesting Lawyer
Poorly structured founder equity is one of the most common causes of early startup disputes. Anthony Girand Law helps founders document equity splits and vesting before problems arise.
Why Founder Equity Needs Structure
Co-founder disputes over equity are among the leading causes of early startup failure, often because splits were agreed informally without addressing what happens if a founder's role changes or a founder leaves. Documenting equity terms clearly from the outset reduces this risk substantially.
Determining the Split
Equity splits typically reflect each founder's role, time commitment, prior contributions such as intellectual property or capital, and expected ongoing involvement. There is no universal formula, but the split should be discussed explicitly and documented rather than assumed.
Standard Vesting Terms
A common standard is a four-year vesting schedule with a one-year cliff — no equity vests during the first year, after which a portion vests immediately, with the remainder vesting monthly or quarterly over the following three years. This structure protects the company if a founder departs early.
Handling Founder Departures
A well-drafted founder agreement addresses what happens to unvested — and sometimes vested — equity if a founder leaves voluntarily, is removed, or becomes unable to continue, reducing ambiguity and potential disputes at a difficult time.
Why Investors Require Vesting
Investors generally require founder vesting as a condition of financing, since it ensures that founders remain incentivized to continue building the company and that equity does not remain with a founder who leaves shortly after a round closes.
Revisiting Equity as the Company Grows
As roles evolve, companies sometimes need to address additional equity grants, re-vesting, or option pool expansions, all of which should be handled with the same documentation discipline as the original founder agreement.
Working With Anthony Girand, Esq.
Anthony Girand, Esq. is a JD/MBA and Maryland attorney whose practice includes immigration, tax controversy, federal litigation, startup law, and regulatory compliance. He brings a business-minded legal perspective to matters involving federal agencies, founders, professionals, companies, and individuals facing consequential legal decisions.
Attorney advertising. This website is for general informational purposes only and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Anthony Girand Law provides outside counsel to founders and companies on formation, equity, financing, contracts, governance, and disputes. Share a few details to help the firm evaluate and route your inquiry.
Tell Us About Your Company and Legal Needs
Whether you are forming a company, dividing founder equity, raising capital, or addressing a dispute, provide a few details below.
Step 1 of 2
Related Legal Guides
Frequently Asked Questions

About Anthony Girand, Esq.
Anthony Girand, Esq. is a JD/MBA attorney with a federal practice spanning immigration, tax controversy, federal litigation, startup law, and regulatory compliance matters, including MoCRA and cosmetics compliance. He has been a member of the Maryland Bar since 1995.
His combined legal and business background allows him to counsel founders, business owners, and individuals facing complex federal legal matters with practical, business-minded strategy.
Read the full biography →Attorney Advertising Disclaimer
Attorney Advertising. This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Contacting Anthony Girand Law through this website does not create an attorney-client relationship. Do not send confidential information until an attorney-client relationship has been established in writing. Past results, if discussed, do not guarantee future outcomes. Read full disclaimer.